When animals are transported and pass through customs, some of them may have dangerous infectious diseases. Typically, due to the cost of testing, not all animals are tested: a reasonable selection must be made. How to test effectively, yet avoid cataclysmic events? First, we extend a model proposed in the literature for the detection of invasive species to suit our purpose. Secondly, we explore and compare two decision methodologies on the problem at hand, namely, info-gap theory and imprecise probability theory, both of which are designed to handle severe uncertainty. We show that, under rather general conditions, every info-gap solution is maximal with respect to a suitably chosen imprecise probability model, and that therefore, perhaps surprisingly, the set of maximal options can be inferred at least partly---and sometimes entirely---from an info-gap analysis.
The paper is available in the following formats:
Plenary talk: file
Poster: file
Matthias Troffaes
Department of Mathematical Sciences
Durham University
Science Laboratories, South Road
Durham, DH1 3LE
John Paul Gosling
The Food and Environment Research Agency
Sand Hutton
York YO41 1LZ
Matthias Troffaes | matthias.troffaes@gmail.com | |
John Paul Gosling | johnpaul.gosling@fera.gsi.gov.uk |
Send any remarks to isipta11@uibk.ac.at.